ant-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stefan Bodewig <>
Subject Re: [CANCELLED] Release AntUnit 1.4 Based on RC2
Date Fri, 22 Jun 2018 05:22:47 GMT
On 2018-06-21, Gintautas Grigelionis wrote:

> I decide to look at antlib builds,


> and I wonder why common/ contain

> javac.-source=1.2
> javac.-target=1.2

Because this has been the baseline when we created the antlibs and
nobody has bothered to update them.

> Shouldn't antlibs be baselined to something more recent?

I'd say yes for any Antlib that was under active development - i.e. at
best AntUnit and Compress (which is my pet project but likely not used
by many people).

> P.S. I'm struggling to understand why "ant test" of antlibs bails
> because "compile-tests" goes "setup-for-junit-tests, antlib, resolve"
> rather than doing "resolve" first and using the retrieved
> dependencies?

antlib depends on compile which depends on resolve - so resolve is
supposed to be run long before any of the other targets,

Not sure what "bails" in your case (it doesn't for me) but maybe we are
missing a dependency somewhere in the graph.


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message