ant-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gintautas Grigelionis <g.grigelio...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Ant JUnit tests
Date Fri, 20 Apr 2018 08:41:50 GMT
Assumption is a "friendly reminder" -- the test is does not run unless the
assumption is valid; the assumption provides an explanation of what is
missing. My question was about how friendly we should be.

Gintas

2018-04-20 7:14 GMT+02:00 Jaikiran Pai <jai.forums2013@gmail.com>:

> Like discussed in the other thread, I don't understand what's wrong with
> setting the expected properties in the IDE itself (like the "ant.home").
> IDEs provide these configurations/settings for reasons like these. What
> would it achieve by virtually disabling these tests, in IDE, by adding
> those assumptions?
>
> -Jaikiran
>
>
>
> On 20/04/18 10:39 AM, Gintautas Grigelionis wrote:
>
>> I am refactoring Ant JUnit tests with a goal to make them more
>> "IDE-friendly". I found several tests that are implictly dependent on
>> ant.home property being set. In these cases, the test should be prevented
>> from execution by adding an assumption; however, perhaps there might be a
>> suitable default, like basedir + "/bootstrap" or some other location that
>> might be suggested in, say, javadoc?
>>
>> Thanks, Gintas
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message