ant-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Charles Duffy <char...@dyfis.net>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Ivy 2.4.0-rc1 Release
Date Fri, 14 Feb 2014 13:55:35 GMT
Apologies -- new job; I dropped the ball somewhat. I'll try to get things
back on track this weekend.


On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 1:58 AM, Jean-Louis Boudart <
jeanlouis.boudart@gmail.com> wrote:

> Is the release over ?
>
> I dont find it on maven central
> Le 28 janv. 2014 01:46, "Charles Duffy" <charles@dyfis.net> a écrit :
>
> > The keys are actually different -- the one used by the currently-posted
> > .asc files is associated with Indeed, Inc. I'll be resigning the binaries
> > after verifying that their Indeed signatures are intact (and moving them
> to
> > dist.apache.org at that time).
> >
> > Expect a note in this thread when that happens.
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 6:42 PM, Nicolas Lalevée <
> > nicolas.lalevee@hibnet.org
> > > wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Le 22 janv. 2014 à 00:52, Nicolas Lalevée <nicolas.lalevee@hibnet.org>
> a
> > > écrit :
> > >
> > > > I have found some issues. The source distribution seems to miss some
> > > test files. I guess this has been the case for quite some time. And it
> is
> > > "just" about the tests. And it is an RC. So OK for me. And I will fix
> > that
> > > soon in trunk.
> > > >
> > > > To avoid confusion and make things simpler, I suggest we modify the
> > > release process to that everything goes through the svn of
> > dist.apache.org,
> > > and not use anymore people.apache.org. In the end, everything is
> > > published there.
> > > > And I'll modify in the doc of the release process the template of the
> > > email of the vote to include a line that is referencing the svn tag. So
> > > it's more difficult to miss it, and it is helpful to do review.
> > > >
> > > > I have tested the staging update site: works like a charm.
> > > >
> > > > So LGTM.
> > > >
> > > > I will cast my vote as soon as I can verify the signature of the
> > > artifacts.
> > >
> > > You pushed some keys to the KEYS files, but it doesn't seems to be the
> > > same as the one you used to sign the proposed artifacts.
> > >
> > > My gpg is asking for the key ID 93FB868A. Did I do something wrong or
> the
> > > keys are actually different ?
> > >
> > > Nicolas
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Nicolas
> > > >
> > > > Le 21 janv. 2014 à 17:19, Charles Duffy <charles@dyfis.net> a écrit
> :
> > > >
> > > >> FYI --
> > > >>
> > > >> A tag at
> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ant/ivy/core/tags/2.4.0-rc1now
> > > >> exists. This differs from the branch head from which the binaries
> for
> > > test
> > > >> were built only inasmuch as its svn:externals specify a specific
> > > revision
> > > >> of the documentation build tools rather than leaving their revision
> > > >> floating.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 6:54 AM, Charles Duffy <charles@dyfis.net>
> > > wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> Howdy --
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I've attempted to follow the documentation at
> > > >>> http://ant.apache.org/ivy/history/trunk/dev/makerelease.html and
> > > >>>
> http://ant.apache.org/ivy/ivyde/history/trunk/dev/updatesite.html(as
> > > >>> included-by-reference in the former) in preparing the above. That
> > > said, it
> > > >>> appears that I missed step 12 (and, accordingly, have a 1.4.0-rc1
> > > branch,
> > > >>> from the present tip of which the binaries were built, but no
> > > associated
> > > >>> tag).
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I'll be sure to get KEYS up-to-date. Thank you for the pointers.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 6:26 AM, Stefan Bodewig <
> bodewig@apache.org
> > > >wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> Hi Charles,
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> we don't really release binaries, they are just a convenience.
>  All
> > > that
> > > >>>> matters as a release is the sources.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> I'm not sure there is anything documenting the release process
for
> > Ivy
> > > >>>> but in general you create an svn tag and build source and
binary
> > > >>>> distributions from that.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> What you have built now is a binary for testing and you don't
> really
> > > >>>> need to vote on that at all.  Just encourage people to try
it out
> > :-)
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> If you want to perform some sort of test-release, have a look
at
> > > >>>> <http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ant/antlibs/ReleaseInstructions>
> > and
> > > >>>> similar instructions to get an idea of what is expected.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> PS -- As this build was performed on hardware owned by
Indeed,
> > Inc.,
> > > the
> > > >>>>> binaries are signed with the duffy@indeed.com GPG key.
For any
> > final
> > > >>>>> release, I would be using hardware under personal control
and a
> key
> > > >>>>> associated with cduffy@apache.org.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Please make sure whatever key you use is inside
> > > >>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/ant/KEYS - if you
need
> > any
> > > >>>> help committing it there, please yell.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Cheers
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>       Stefan
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
> > > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message