ant-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Peter Reilly" <>
Subject Re: CVS - to antlib or not?
Date Fri, 09 Mar 2007 10:32:01 GMT
I do not like this.

We have svn in ant core, and due to bc reasons
we always will.

I would perfer to move svn to ant core, or
at least bundle the ant-svn antlib with the release
of ant so that one does not have to
do an extra download.


On 3/9/07, Kevin Jackson <> wrote:
> Hi all,
> Since we have an svn antlib, I was thinking should we move the cvs
> code out of the core into it's own lib?
> I've done the majority of the work (setting up the projects copying
> and renaming code etc), but I need to know whether this is acceptable
> for sandbox or not?
> For BWC we could delegate calls to the normal CVS task to the antlib
> version for now and then later remove the stub in the core after a
> reasonable amount of time has passed.
> My rationale for doing this is to get most of the SCM stuff out of the
> core and into separate antlibs.  CVS is just low-hanging fruit so I
> thought we could at least give it some thought.
> Any objections?
> Kev
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> For additional commands, e-mail:

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message