--- Antoine Levy-Lambert <antoine@gmx.de> wrote:
> Matt Benson wrote:
> > Hmm... nobody knows about (1) and nobody minds
> about (2)? Going once...
> >
> > -Matt
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----
> > From: Matt Benson <gudnabrsam@yahoo.com>
> > To: Ant Developers List <dev@ant.apache.org>
> > Sent: Friday, September 29, 2006 2:00:27 PM
> > Subject: nodeps jar
> >
> >
> > I'm curious why the launcher classes are in this
> jar. Do they really need to be?
> >
> >
> I do not have a clue. I suppose you mean this is a
> potentially dangerous
> duplication ? May be the launcher classes are called
> from some of the
> optional nodeps tasks.
Dangerous and/or just kind of weird. :) I can check
whether the launcher classes are used. Even if this
is the case, however, ant-core uses launcher classes
and doesn't duplicate them in the jar. ant.jar
requires ant-launcher.jar, so I don't see why
ant-nodeps.jar shouldn't do the same.
> > Additionally, any arguments against "moving"
> (while retaining API BC) some of the
> always-available "optional" tasks e.g.
> echoproperties to oata.taskdefs?
> >
> >
> I do not have any objections regarding
> echoproperties. propertyfile
> would then be a similar case ?
Exactly.
> > -Matt
> >
> >
> >
> >
> Regards,
>
> Antoine
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> dev-help@ant.apache.org
>
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
|