> I did not see the changes. But in principle I agree with Dominique > that a roledef should have 3 attributes : > name, role, classname Just to clarify, I like the way Peter implemented it (binding a class to a name, without specifying what "role"s this class should play). But the term "role" also implies to me a (name, role, classname) tupple, which is why I'd prefer not using , that's all. Last night I thought that , although longuish, might be a better term than or . --DD --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org