apache-ant-dotnet-0.1-SNAPSHOT-bin.zip
- /LICENSE:190: * Copyright [yyyy] [name of copyright owner]
No year, no copyright owner?
(same inside the jar)
- version=0.1 ?
that value is defined in common/build.xml but should be overwritten in a build.properties
- JAR!/manifest.mf:
should we include version information (about the antlib) in the manifest file?
Cant do a functional test, because of no-.NET.knowledge :-)
But besides that +1 from me.
Jan
>-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>Von: Conor MacNeill [mailto:conor@apache.org]
>Gesendet: Freitag, 8. September 2006 14:20
>An: Ant Developers List
>Betreff: Re: [VOTE] New Release Candidate for .NET Antlib 1.0 Beta 1
>
>Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>> I've put up new builds of source and binary distributions
>for the .NEt
>> Antlib. This time I even went the extra mile of typing my
>passphrase
>> six times, which means the files are PGP signed 8-)
>>
>> <http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/dotnet-rc/distribution/>
>>
>> I think I've addressed all (well, most) of Jan's comments
>made on the
>> "What should an Antlib distribution contain" thread, which means the
>> source distribution now actually builds ;-)
>>
>> As with last time, I haven't updated the version number yet,
>but I do
>> have (uncommitted) tags that correspond to the exact code.
>>
>> Please give those archives a try and if you feel comfortable with
>> distributing the contents (with adapted version numbers) as Ant 1.0
>> Beta 1 then cast your +1
>>
>
>+1
>
>except to calling it Ant 1.0 Beta 1 :-)
>
>Conor
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org For
>additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
|