ant-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Dominique Devienne" <>
Subject Re: antunit integration
Date Thu, 14 Sep 2006 19:56:18 GMT
Trying to resend, since bounced. --DD

On 9/14/06, Dominique Devienne <> wrote:
> >  DD opined he would
> > prefer INcluding **/*-test.xml , **/*Test.xml , or
> > some other known pattern to excluding support files.
> > My rationale is that I expect the majority of files
> > under src/tests/antunit to be antunit test files; thus
> > the few exceptions = exclusions.
> Well, I'm an OptIn proponent, rather than an OptOut kinda guy ;-)
> Using a test suffix is consistent with the JUnit convention,
> and to me simply expresses *better* what these XML files are,
> i.e. they are tests. I can refer in a post to taskdef-test.xml,
> thus unambiguously expressing that I'm talking about the AntUnit
> test for <taskdef>.
> This to me is more important that saving a few keystroke
> on all the test files added. One can agree that these XML files
> will be in a dir specific to AntUnit test, that most files will have
> to be called tests, etc...
> In fine, either convention is fine with me, but I personally think that
> using a test suffix is the better alternative. --DD

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message