Hi,
I agree with Jan. I do not understand ultra compact syntax. I do not know operators precedence
by heart. What I do not master at all are bitwise operations with << | & ....
Regards,
Antoine
-------- Original-Nachricht --------
Datum: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 16:50:18 +0200
Von: Jan.Materne@rzf.fin-nrw.de
An: dev@ant.apache.org
Betreff: AW: AW: svn commit: r450609 - /ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/util/ConcatResourceInputStream.java
> Sorry, I didnt know about your low-RAM-machine - I only see my strong
> glasses ... ;-)
>
> I think a readable code is more worth than a few bytes... so I am +1 for
> reverting.
>
>
> Jan
>
>
> >-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> >Von: Matt Benson [mailto:gudnabrsam@yahoo.com]
> >Gesendet: Donnerstag, 28. September 2006 16:37
> >An: Ant Developers List
> >Betreff: Re: AW: svn commit: r450609 -
> >/ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/util/ConcatResour
> >ceInputStream.java
> >
> >--- Jan.Materne@rzf.fin-nrw.de wrote:
> >[SNIP] (RE removing parens from ternary ops)
> >> What is the advantage apart from decreasing readability?
> >>
> >
> >Sorry, just my irrational resentment of unnecessary bytes...
> >we can put them back if you like and I'll try to control myself.
> >
> >-Matt
> >
> >> Jan
> >>
> >>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
|