--- Stefan Bodewig <bodewig@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as I stated in another thread, I don't feel bad for
> extending
> ConditionBase but if a majority here would prefer
> AsserTask to stick
> with a simple add(Condition) in a task derived
> class, I'd be up for it
> as well. I'd only want to see this straightened out
> before we release
> the first AntUnit beta, which is why I'll try drive
> this to a closure
> pretty quickly.
>
> Can we have a little poll here, please:
>
> (1) Would you prefer a version of AssertTask that
> didn't extend
> ConditionBase?
I wouldn't fight it, but I don't see the need,
personally.
-Matt
>
> If so
>
> (2) Would you want AntUnit to silently typedef all
> existing conditions
> into the AntUnit namespace? People wouldn't
> even notice.
>
> or
>
> Would you prefer users to explicitly use an
> antlib to use the
> existing core conditions?
>
> Stefan
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> dev-help@ant.apache.org
>
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
|