Matt Benson wrote: > --- Steve Loughran wrote: > [SNIP] >> I know I normally ignore the no-xerces test failures > > Me, too... I was just thinking eventually we should > address these... then I hit "delete". :) I dont actually see gump messages any more, my eye just filters them out. They are like messages from HR or corporate news; my brain refuses to parse their very existence. Which is a shame, as gump is valuable, >> as I assume its >> crimson, but there really are some failing tests >> here, above and beyond >> the include tests >> >> [junit] Testcase: >> > test3(org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.ANTLRTest): >> FAILED >> [junit] expected:<5> but was:<8> > > Hmm, couldn't say about the ANTLRTest. IMHO the ANTLR > task is broken. I'm a regular lurker over there; > Scott Stanchfield had talked about rewriting the ANTLR > task... if so, I'm reasonably sure Terence will host > it. Maybe we could then get the legacy task back on > its proverbial feet, mark the code as untouchable, and > deprecate it... seems good. we use at work, so care about its existence. > > [SNIP] >> [junit] Testcase: >> > testResourceSelectorSimple(org.apache.tools.ant.types.selectors.ModifiedSelectorTest): >> Caused an ERROR >> [junit] restrict doesn't support the nested >> "modified" element. > > Interesting. This will come down to myself or Jan to > fix, I suppose. :) I'll have a look. > OK --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org