From dev-return-62831-apmail-ant-dev-archive=ant.apache.org@ant.apache.org Tue Jan 11 12:58:36 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 46408 invoked from network); 11 Jan 2005 12:58:35 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Jan 2005 12:58:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 78638 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jan 2005 12:58:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 78418 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jan 2005 12:58:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Ant Developers List" Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 78405 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jan 2005 12:58:33 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from bodewig.bost.de (HELO bodewig.bost.de) (62.96.16.111) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Jan 2005 04:58:32 -0800 Received: (from bodewig@localhost) by bodewig.bost.de (8.11.6/8.11.6) id j0BCwT531560; Tue, 11 Jan 2005 13:58:29 +0100 X-Authentication-Warning: bodewig.bost.de: bodewig set sender to bodewig@apache.org using -f To: dev@ant.apache.org Subject: Re: local properties X-Draft-From: ("nnfolder:mail.jakarta-ant" 64572) References: <41E3BCFA.8060402@apache.org> <41E3BDF6.2080501@it.fts-vn.com> From: Stefan Bodewig Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 13:58:29 +0100 In-Reply-To: <41E3BDF6.2080501@it.fts-vn.com> (Kev Jackson's message of "Tue, 11 Jan 2005 18:52:22 +0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Security Through Obscurity, linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Tue, 11 Jan 2005, Kev Jackson wrote: > >> Sounds good, but is it possible to get a different name than "let" >> ? >> >> Peter > > Following the VBness of "let", how about "dim"? ;) Actually it's a Lispness - for those of us who liked the name let, at least 8-) Hmm, borrowing from Emacs lisp, defvar? define-property? Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org