From dev-return-62779-apmail-ant-dev-archive=ant.apache.org@ant.apache.org Sat Jan 08 14:39:23 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 62077 invoked from network); 8 Jan 2005 14:39:22 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Jan 2005 14:39:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 36429 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jan 2005 14:39:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 36365 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jan 2005 14:39:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Ant Developers List" Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 36350 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jan 2005 14:39:20 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from Unknown (HELO cellectivity.com) (212.18.242.163) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Sat, 08 Jan 2005 06:39:19 -0800 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C4F58F.D901E508" Subject: RE: local properties Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 14:39:24 -0000 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: local properties Thread-Index: AcT0zUNbvVHN/ffeRPGtCvuGnLQ/+QAwWQ/H From: "Jose Alberto Fernandez" To: "Ant Developers List" X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N ------_=_NextPart_001_01C4F58F.D901E508 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable We left it nowhere. =20 I still think my simple addition to will solve 90% of = the use cases with very low impact across the code. But as anything, people will have = to understand when to use it properly and so on. =20 The patch is there in bugzilla, but I will not apply it unless there is = some support for it (I have not have the need for local properties myself, so it is not a = problem for me). =20 As per other approaches to local properties, unless we go and define a = real semantic for them (like any other well design programming language out there) I = see they creating more problems than solutions, in particular in our BC constrained world. =20 Jose Alberto ________________________________ From: Matt Benson [mailto:gudnabrsam@yahoo.com] Sent: Fri 07/01/2005 15:26 To: Ant Developers List Subject: local properties Does anyone recall where we left off on this discussion? I think we need these, what do we need to resolve to get them in? -Matt =20 __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org ------_=_NextPart_001_01C4F58F.D901E508 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org ------_=_NextPart_001_01C4F58F.D901E508--