From dev-return-62708-apmail-ant-dev-archive=ant.apache.org@ant.apache.org Fri Jan 07 00:24:02 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 33607 invoked from network); 7 Jan 2005 00:24:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Jan 2005 00:24:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 55522 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jan 2005 00:24:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 55167 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jan 2005 00:24:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Ant Developers List" Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 55153 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jan 2005 00:24:00 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=10.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from ajax-1.apache.org (HELO ajax.apache.org) (192.87.106.226) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 16:23:58 -0800 Received: from ajax.apache.org (ajax.apache.org [127.0.0.1]) by ajax.apache.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j070NuuG012429 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 01:23:56 +0100 Received: (from nobody@localhost) by ajax.apache.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id j070NtLh012427; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 01:23:55 +0100 Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 01:23:55 +0100 Message-Id: <200501070023.j070NtLh012427@ajax.apache.org> From: bugzilla@apache.org To: dev@ant.apache.org Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32977] - Ant handles ".." in paths incorrectly X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32977 ------- Additional Comments From ips@apache.org 2005-01-07 01:23 ------- I find it very mildly disturbing :-) The chance that there would be a directory by that name in the root directory is minute. I can appreciate the intention of the way Ant is behaving. However, I think it's overstepping its boundaries. It should be up to the script developer to make sure ".."'s are being used as he/she intends them to be used. Perhaps a compromise would be for Ant to print a warning message if it notices redundant ".."'s, e.g.: Warning, Line 11: Path "../../../../webapps/wsrf" contains redundant ".." elements. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org