On Thu, 29 Apr 2004, Jose Alberto Fernandez
<jalberto@cellectivity.com> wrote:
>> From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:bodewig@apache.org]
>>
>> On Thu, 29 Apr 2004, Jose Alberto Fernandez
>> <jalberto@cellectivity.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Why aren't all the conditions being types?
>>
>> Because the answer "Why aren't all the selectors being
>> types?" is equally valid. Which one gets typedefed as "and"?
>>
> Fair enough, are <and/> and <or/> the only ones in limbo?
and <not/>.
> Can we (have we) type all the rest?
We could, but we haven't.
> PS: What is our assesment for implementing the role bit?
That we've tabled any discussion until ... well, until anybody picks up
the issue again?
Stefan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
|