ant-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stefan Bodewig <>
Subject Re: Vote: <local> for 1.6
Date Fri, 24 Oct 2003 11:36:45 GMT
On Thu, 23 Oct 2003, peter reilly <> wrote:

>    - should the default uri be "" to
>      be consistent with other antlib uri's

it would only be consistent if there was an antlib.xml in the ant
package.  I wouldn't mind having one that was restricted to types and
tasks for now.

>    - should the uris of introspection discovered nested elements be
>      the same as the containing task

I'm not sure I understand.  I think you mean whether


would be associated with foo's or the URI that belongs to the default
namespace.  I'd apply the namespace rules here.  I.e. if you want bar
to be looked up in foo's URI space, you'd have to write

<x:foo xmlns="...">

Maybe I'm not understanding what you mean.

> * antlib support
>    - should <typedef resource="x"/> look for all instances of x or
>      just the first one.
>      + I think it should.

you think it should what? 8-)

Could you elaborate on the impact?  Up until now it would have picked
up only the first resource, so if we change that now, it might be
backwards incompatible (though that's probably extremely unlikely).


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message