ant-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Sean Rohead" <>
Subject Re: Bug 3304
Date Fri, 26 Sep 2003 22:11:23 GMT
You are correct.  I apologize for not having read the original
enhancement more carefully.  I have submitted a new enhancement
( that solves
the problem I have described.
Sean Rohead
On Fri, 26 Sep 2003 02:36 am, Sean Rohead wrote:
> Thanks for the replies.
> But I'm still confused about the reluctance to embrace the original
> proposal.  
The original proposal does not solve your problem. It adds a property
changes to the target name currently being executed. If you put this in
lib target, for instance, you would always execute the lib target in

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message