ant-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stefan Bodewig <>
Subject Re: antlib
Date Wed, 23 Apr 2003 15:11:33 GMT
On Wed, 23 Apr 2003, Jose Alberto Fernandez
<> wrote:

> I am not even sure the code today was examining the value.

8-)  It's been a long time, I know.

> we probably should define more meaningful attributes
> 	ant-required-version, antlib-version (version used to buils
> 	the library)
> that would probably mate things more clear.

Fine with me.

>> With that, do we really need separate <task> and <data-type> in
>> <antlib> or are they just special cases of roles?
> They should be.

So if they are just roles, why treat them in a different way than
other roles?  Why a <task> element?

<define classname="..." name="..." role="task"/>

could do the same and be more consistent.  I don't have a strong
feeling here, just trying to find my way through the ideas without
having to read the code ;-)

Maybe something could even be in different roles at the same time?
See available, checksum or uptodate for things that are tasks and
conditions in one.

> Let me first say that this feature appeared by the need to be able
> to say,
> 	<antlib name="A" classpathref="XYZ"/>
> 	<antlib name="B" classpathref="XYZ"/>
> And being able to make sure that B and A use the same classLoader
> and therefore they can use each other components.

I understand that usecase and think it's important.  See Steve
Loughran's comment on the .NET tasks wanting to have access to the
datatypes defined in the cpptasks project for example.

> My solution at the time was this idea of a named classloader that
> you could define using a classpath, and then tell your antlibs use
> this or that classloader, if you use the same classloader visibility
> is guaranteed.

Take a look at what Costin had done to <taskdef> and <typedef> with
the loaderref attribute.  This has now (i.e. CVS HEAD) been
generalized in ClasspathUtils, the infrastructure for named
classloaders is there - at least the foundation for it.


View raw message