ant-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From peter reilly <peter.rei...@corvil.com>
Subject Re: antlib
Date Wed, 23 Apr 2003 16:52:51 GMT
On Wednesday 23 April 2003 17:41, Dominique Devienne wrote:
> Let's turn around your question: Tell me of a (string) role (beside the
> special task/type cases) that would not be an interface? What good a bean
> is, if it's not of an expected Java type? What method or field are you
> going to use/call on it?
>
> I agree with Costin, all tasks/types become simply beans. You should be
> able to use any one of these beans in any place it's suitable to use it,
> i.e. any time the Java type/role requested is part of the bean's type (in
> the isAssigneableFrom() sense).
>
> The type being requested depends on who requests it. Inside or outside
> targets, it's any bean. And I mean really any bean: Doesn't need to
> implement anything Ant-related. This is implicitly what we call today a
> datatype, and they can be id'd. The subset of these beans that also have an
> execute method are also implicitly tasks. The different subsets of these
> beans that implements FileSelector are suitable to use within filesets, and
> tasks deriving from MatchingTask since we're talking about it.
>
> I fail to see what is wrong with this scenario. --DD

The only problem is the namespace problem. But this is not a huge restriction.
Peter.


Mime
View raw message