DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15550>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15550
Internal Javadoc?
------- Additional Comments From stevel@apache.org 2003-03-11 16:35 -------
we kind of depend on exec() in so much of ant, that pre-macos X is not a
realistic problem to address.
In VM javadoc may be faster, and faster is better. Has anyone tested it to see
if it leaks like a sieve the way javac has historically? It took a lot of time
for sun to fix that, which required them to recognise that in-VM javac was
actually a legitimate activity.
|