ant-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Peter Donald <>
Subject Re: [warning inflammatory email] Stagn-ant?
Date Mon, 08 Jul 2002 12:39:11 GMT
On Mon, 8 Jul 2002 15:29, Conor MacNeill wrote:
> > Ant 1.x has been around a very long time now, and some of the proposals
> > have been around for more than a year. It seems that there is a general
> > unwillingness to make a move forward.
> Unwillingness?  Maybe. IMHO, I think the problem comes more from a lack
> of defined process for adopting a codebase. Is it by majority vote - is
> there a possibility for veto? 

I think the rules for revolutionaries would be standard practice here. It was 
not ratified by the PMC but I think that was just a technicality (I vaguely 
recall someone wanting to reword a few sections). You could ask Sam for heads 
up as I am sure he recalls better than I do.

> certainly be convenient in cases. Things like <try>-<catch> should be
> there IMHO. 

agreed ... now if Stefan would just lift his veto .... :)


Peter Donald
Whatever you do will be insignificant, 
but it is very important that you do it. 

To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <>
For additional commands, e-mail: <>

View raw message