ant-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jose Alberto Fernandez <>
Subject Re: Name collisions
Date Fri, 08 Mar 2002 10:10:17 GMT
 --- Stefan Bodewig <> wrote: > On
Thu, 7 Mar 2002, Jose Alberto Fernandez
> <>
> wrote:
> "I don't want to touch this now" was talking about
> the main source
> tree, in no way would I want to restrict what you or
> anybody else is
> doing in the proposal area.
> Hope I've made myself easier to understand this time

Yes you have. And sorry for my "blow up" :-(

In any case, I still would like to get your opinion
on what should be the best behaviour to deal with this

If I have A defined as a task, and I now try to define
A as a data-type, should I:
 (1) redefine A (just like I would do if A was being
redefined as a different task) or should I 
 (2) fail because of trying to redefined to a
different kind of thing.

This is my dilema and what I would like input from you
guys. (2) is much easier to implement, but (1) takes
the burden from library developers on having to know
the mappings of everything a priori.


Jose Alberto

Jose Alberto

Do You Yahoo!?
Everything you'll ever need on one web page
from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts

To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <>
For additional commands, e-mail: <>

View raw message