From ant-dev-return-22240-qmlist-jakarta-archive-ant-dev=jakarta.apache.org@jakarta.apache.org Thu Jan 03 16:35:29 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-ant-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 41587 invoked from network); 3 Jan 2002 16:35:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Jan 2002 16:35:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 14296 invoked by uid 97); 3 Jan 2002 16:35:26 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 14280 invoked by uid 97); 3 Jan 2002 16:35:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ant-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Ant Developers List" Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 14269 invoked from network); 3 Jan 2002 16:35:24 -0000 Message-ID: <502326F46B08D41191C400508B6D70C10235CA0E@ThisAddressDoesNotExist> From: Les Hughes To: Ant Developers List Subject: RE: Websphere ejbjar task Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 16:34:23 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hi, Is this a WAS V4 or 3.5.x deploy tool? If the later (and we dont have 3.5.x support) then I have some code that might be useful ;-) Bye, Les > -----Original Message----- > From: Holger Engels [mailto:hengels@mercatis.de] > Sent: 03 January 2002 06:51 > To: Ant Developers List > Subject: Re: Websphere ejbjar task > > > On Wed, 2 Jan 2002, Todd Chambery wrote: > > > Conor, > > > > I'm looking through the code, and it looks similar to what > I hacked up (much > > cleaner and complete though). I have 2 (two) questions: > > > > 1) the "alwaysRebuild" attribute to the websphere task > isn't exposed. Is > > this an oversight, or intentional? > > oversight! > > > 2) can you elaborate on the manifest issue? I only see one > reference to the > > manifest, and that is in the isRebuildRequired method. > > I added this feature to the GenericDeploymentTool some time > ago. One issue > remained: if you chose to use the naming convention, a changed > manifest-files would not be detected by the dependency > checks. There would > be no rebuild, if only manifest files changed. > > > apart from the manifest problem, it looks like it works great. > > At least on linux and windows 2k .. I did not test it on > other platforms. > The automatical 'ejbdeploy' did only work for me, if I used > the ibm-jdk. > otherwise ibm's rmic throws a ClassFormatError, that > complains about a > bad UTF8-String constant in the class' constant pool. > > > > Holger > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: