On Wed, 23 Jan 2002 01:50, Conor MacNeill wrote: > >>Further, if we're really moving to a container architecture with Ant2, > >> then we should define a spec for the build file, execution engine, and > >> task extensions API through a JSR and have a separate jakarta project > >> for the optional task libraries, similar to the "taglibs" project that > >> provides libraries for extending JSP. That project would build many jar > >> files, which could be included in the project via build file reference & > >> descriptor as mentioned above. > > > > +1 > > > > I have campaigned for this many a time but everytime there is a committer > > that will veto it ... > > Just to be clear - you are not supporting a JSR style process, are you? If by this you mean forming a committee to determine the participants in a subcommittee which will generate a report on the findings of a feature ... then no ... I wont be supporting that. But don't let me stop you doing that if you feel like it. -- Cheers, Pete When a stupid man is doing something he's ashamed of, he always declares that it is his duty. George Bernard Shaw -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: