From ant-dev-return-23479-qmlist-jakarta-archive-ant-dev=jakarta.apache.org@jakarta.apache.org Wed Jan 23 11:06:19 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-ant-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 4879 invoked from network); 23 Jan 2002 11:06:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Jan 2002 11:06:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 6517 invoked by uid 97); 23 Jan 2002 11:05:23 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 6415 invoked by uid 97); 23 Jan 2002 11:05:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ant-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Ant Developers List" Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 6188 invoked from network); 23 Jan 2002 11:05:16 -0000 Message-Id: <200201230915.g0N9FlR12297@mail004.syd.optusnet.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" From: Peter Donald To: "Ant Developers List" Subject: Re: Ant 1.9 & Task Packaging Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 18:54:21 +1100 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] References: <001301c1a2c3$d587be10$6501a8c0@hagrid> <200201220941.g0M9fwE23700@mail016.syd.optusnet.com.au> <3C4D7C33.5030308@cortexebusiness.com.au> In-Reply-To: <3C4D7C33.5030308@cortexebusiness.com.au> X-Wisdom-Cookie: . MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Wed, 23 Jan 2002 01:50, Conor MacNeill wrote: > >>Further, if we're really moving to a container architecture with Ant2, > >> then we should define a spec for the build file, execution engine, and > >> task extensions API through a JSR and have a separate jakarta project > >> for the optional task libraries, similar to the "taglibs" project that > >> provides libraries for extending JSP. That project would build many jar > >> files, which could be included in the project via build file reference & > >> descriptor as mentioned above. > > > > +1 > > > > I have campaigned for this many a time but everytime there is a committer > > that will veto it ... > > Just to be clear - you are not supporting a JSR style process, are you? If by this you mean forming a committee to determine the participants in a subcommittee which will generate a report on the findings of a feature ... then no ... I wont be supporting that. But don't let me stop you doing that if you feel like it. -- Cheers, Pete When a stupid man is doing something he's ashamed of, he always declares that it is his duty. George Bernard Shaw -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: