From ant-dev-return-23440-qmlist-jakarta-archive-ant-dev=jakarta.apache.org@jakarta.apache.org Tue Jan 22 13:44:01 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-ant-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 22829 invoked from network); 22 Jan 2002 13:44:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Jan 2002 13:44:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 17973 invoked by uid 97); 22 Jan 2002 13:43:57 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 17957 invoked by uid 97); 22 Jan 2002 13:43:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ant-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Ant Developers List" Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 17946 invoked from network); 22 Jan 2002 13:43:56 -0000 Message-Id: <200201221343.g0MDhtR18451@mail004.syd.optusnet.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" From: Peter Donald To: "Ant Developers List" Subject: Re: Ant 1.9 & Task Packaging Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 00:40:15 +1100 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] References: <001301c1a2c3$d587be10$6501a8c0@hagrid> <200201220941.g0M9fwE23700@mail016.syd.optusnet.com.au> In-Reply-To: X-Wisdom-Cookie: . MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Wed, 23 Jan 2002 00:27, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On Tue, 22 Jan 2002, Peter Donald wrote: > > Unfortunately the best first-cut was largely ignored by ant-dev > > because it was a non-committer who submitted it. > > I guess you are talking about antfarm. yup ;) > > Then Stefan said he would no try to block anything unless it really > > sucked - however he wouldn't support or work on anything until it > > was ready to go. > > until *he* was ready to go. 8-) oh - must have missed that bit :) > > Another way to do this (and the standard way for java applications) > > is via the JDK1.3 "Optional Packages" Specification. > > Slow down a little, we are just leaving JDK 1.1 compatibility with > Ant2. It does not have any requirements on a JDK1.3 JVM - it is just described there ... evolution of earlier "Extension" spec. It could be implemented fine on a jdk1.1 if you wanted. -- Cheers, Pete *------------------------------------------------* | Trying is the first step to failure. | | So never try, Lisa - Homer Jay Simpson | *------------------------------------------------* -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: