ant-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Adam Murdoch" <>
Subject RE: IntrospectionHelper request
Date Fri, 11 Jan 2002 04:42:45 GMT

> From: Peter Donald []
> >
> > OK, I finally took a quick look at some of the interfaces of 
> Myrmidon and
> > here is a more concrete proposal. So what I am saying is to allow Tasks
> > to provide their own ObjectConfigurer to use by the DefaultConfigurer.
> >
> > Instead of passing the configuration to the object if the Task 
> implements
> > Configurable, what you do is ask the Task to provide an ObjectConfigurer
> > if the Task defines DynamiclyConfigurable (for example):
> >
> >     interface DynamiclyConfigurable {
> >         ObjectConfigurer getConfigurer();
> >     }
> >
> > For what I see of the the definition of ObjectConfigurable is should be
> > quite easy for an object to define its own methods, and if we 
> provide a few
> > predefined helper classes, the whole affair could be even more trivial.
> I don't see how this is any better or worse than what is already there ? 
> Whats to stop a programmer doing evil things with this? Why is this any 
> inherently better than the way it is currently done?

It becomes better once you start adding meta-info discovery methods to ObjectConfigurer (and
rename it TypeInfo, say).

I'm not a big fan of Configurable, for two reasons:  It's an all-or-nothing approach, where
the object has to do all the work.  Granted, there are helpers, but the object is responsible
for doing the work.  I think in almost every case, the task doesn't want to use a completely
non-standard scheme for configuring itself.  Instead the task simply wants to change how a
particular element or attribute is handled, and use the standard scheme for everything else.

The other reason is that Configurable is totally opaque.  You lose meta-info about the object,
and so can't do things like configure it in a GUI, or generate doco for it.


To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <>
For additional commands, e-mail: <>

View raw message