From ant-dev-return-19571-qmlist-jakarta-archive-ant-dev=jakarta.apache.org@jakarta.apache.org Mon Nov 12 12:50:52 2001 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-ant-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 49901 invoked from network); 12 Nov 2001 12:50:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Nov 2001 12:50:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 11826 invoked by uid 97); 12 Nov 2001 12:50:48 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 11810 invoked by uid 97); 12 Nov 2001 12:50:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ant-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Ant Developers List" Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 11799 invoked from network); 12 Nov 2001 12:50:47 -0000 Message-Id: <200111121250.fACCofJ21160@mail008.syd.optusnet.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" From: Peter Donald To: "Ant Developers List" Subject: Re: Antjar and Antlib Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 23:47:42 +1100 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.1] References: <001701c16b53$468455e0$0201a8c0@nordwand> <200111121222.fACCMDD02564@mail004.syd.optusnet.com.au> <3BEFC561.2040509@cortexebusiness.com.au> In-Reply-To: <3BEFC561.2040509@cortexebusiness.com.au> X-Wisdom-Cookie: . MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Mon, 12 Nov 2001 23:49, Conor MacNeill wrote: > Peter Donald wrote: > > On Mon, 12 Nov 2001 23:18, Conor MacNeill wrote: > >>Peter Donald wrote: > >>>You agreed that it was a good idea but the implementation sucked - right > >>>? If so -1 implies you will help fix it. As I said last time - feel free > >>>to fix it. > >> > >>Huh?. Please remove it and commit a more appropriate implementation and > >>I will remove my -1. It is your responsibility to fix it, not mine. > > > > err. There was a discussion on general a while back on the meaning of -1. > > It was decided that a -1 on concept meant don't do it. A -1 on > > implementation of an idea meant I don't like it but I will help help to > > fix it. This was to stop people blocking development who weren't willing > > to help out. I am not sure of exact date of discussion but it should be > > available in general archives. > > > > Given that you can either help fix it ... or you can -1 the idea of a > > manifest task. > > Can you provide a pointer to that discussion - I don't remember it. It > seems a stange process for developing quality software. no idea. Should be possible to find on a search. If you can't find it after you search you should ask either Jon or Sam. I recall both of them being involved in the conversation. > You have chosen to commit a task with significant problems. I have > pointed out those problems - I presume you acknowledge these. can't say I even remember. I assume they are present though. > I'm not > blocking the concept just the implementation - I believe you are quite > capable of fixing that. As you have committed the task, I believe it is > YOUR responsibility to fix it. And I believe in world peace. -- Cheers, Pete *------------------------------------------------------* | "Common sense is the collection of prejudices | | acquired by age 18. " -Albert Einstein | *------------------------------------------------------* -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: