From ant-dev-return-20507-qmlist-jakarta-archive-ant-dev=jakarta.apache.org@jakarta.apache.org Thu Nov 29 11:52:09 2001 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-ant-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 18462 invoked from network); 29 Nov 2001 11:52:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Nov 2001 11:52:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 23423 invoked by uid 97); 29 Nov 2001 11:52:02 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 23332 invoked by uid 97); 29 Nov 2001 11:52:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ant-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Ant Developers List" Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 23275 invoked from network); 29 Nov 2001 11:52:00 -0000 Message-ID: <02b101c178c7$a6d841a0$0100a8c0@jose> From: "Jose Alberto Fernandez" To: "Ant Developers List" References: <00d701c177a1$a4702ee0$0100a8c0@jose> Subject: Re: Should ANT2 be ANT3 Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 11:18:13 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N From: "Stefan Bodewig" > On Wed, 28 Nov 2001, Jose Alberto Fernandez > wrote: >=20 > > It is evident given the current state of affairs that ANT2 is at > > least a year way or something like that. >=20 > I have no idea, but I hope you are wrong. >=20 I think Peter says 9 months, I suppose the assesment does not alot time for any big confrontations (which are not uncommon) ;-) > > So, why don't we modify the road map of ANT and introduce a 2.0 > > version which performs most of the cleaning, adds some of the > > functionality but it is based in the current architecture >=20 > Because we've raised high expectations for Ant2 that wouldn't be met > by this step. >=20 No one is advocating to sell (or promote it) as ANT2. It is just ANT1 = Version 2.0. ANT2 is a project, a code name if you want.=20 We should not confuse that with release numbers. Jose Alberto -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: