From ant-dev-return-19606-qmlist-jakarta-archive-ant-dev=jakarta.apache.org@jakarta.apache.org Tue Nov 13 11:46:14 2001 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-ant-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 53225 invoked from network); 13 Nov 2001 11:46:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Nov 2001 11:46:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 19806 invoked by uid 97); 13 Nov 2001 11:46:08 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 19790 invoked by uid 97); 13 Nov 2001 11:46:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ant-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Ant Developers List" Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 19779 invoked from network); 13 Nov 2001 11:46:07 -0000 Message-ID: <001e01c16c38$55efecc0$0100a8c0@jose> From: "Jose Alberto Fernandez" To: "Ant Developers List" References: <200111121245.fACCj7204129@mail016.syd.optusnet.com.au> <001101c16bfd$76b50fc0$0100a8c0@jose> <200111130901.fAD915228557@mail016.syd.optusnet.com.au> Subject: Re: [PATCH] ant task with (nested) fileset(s) Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 11:42:48 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N From: "Peter Donald" > look above. reread. Ant is not a scripting language. Im not sure how = many=20 > times that has to be said.=20 Yeah, I remember that. That is way no one complained when = and and all the discussion about and and . Little by little is eroding (not that I am happy about it or anything). > Yes XSLT could do that easily enough (via=20 > extensions if you are wondering) but I don't think it should be. When = I said=20 > "I don't think they are needed given (3)" I meant "I don't think they = are=20 > needed given (3)". Any clearer? >=20 > > Without that things like or cannot be express via > > templates which is the point of the discussion.=20 >=20 > who said that ? I don't think the functionality you are desiring from=20 > apply/execon is desired behaviour. The functionality is better = provided via=20 > alternate mechanisms. >=20 Like for example? > I don't have to convince you of anything - you aren't a committer. I = have to=20 > convince other committers or they me - considering the lack of = agreement on=20 > simple things - do you honestly believe this is viable ? >=20 You were the one asking me to walk-the-walk (your walk). But as you well = say, I am not a commiter, so why should you complained I am not doing your walk. And yes, there is very little concensus but I wonder how many people are = on one side and how many in the other, some times it feels like (1-N). Jose Alberto -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: