ant-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Conor MacNeill" <co...@cortexebusiness.com.au>
Subject RE: [VOTE] Logo Decision process
Date Sun, 19 Aug 2001 23:29:41 GMT
Christoph,

Let me add a +1. Sorry, I figured this had lazy approval.

Conor

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christoph Wilhelms [mailto:Christoph.Wilhelms@t-online.de]
> Sent: Monday, 20 August 2001 4:20 AM
> To: ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Logo Decision process
>
>
> Of course you can, for there was just a single +1 vote (mine) on
> the process
> and schedule I proposed. That means, that not enough committers agreed to
> the process and another proposal has to be made and to be voted. Feel free
> to submit. I think I'll come up with a new schedule-proposal next
> week! IMHO
> we need to finsh this task ASAP :-)!
>
> Cheers,
> Chris
>
> > so, can I still mail in a logo sunday night?  or when is the
> > exact deadline?
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Joris
> >
> > Christoph Wilhelms wrote:
> > > Feel free, to arrange groups, then! I do NOT want to have the
> > responsibility
> > > for the groups. Generally I'd -0 the group-topic for I have
> > some concerns,
> > > but I do not veto at all!
> > >
> > > One thing is important to me: We should speed up with the
> > decision project,
> > > to make shure, that we do not lose the logo contributers,
> > because they might
> > > think, that we aren't interested in a logo anymore! An IMHO we
> > need these
> > > contributers after we decided on a logo, because we might need other
> > > versions of the logo: smaller, bigger version, "build by" versions,
> > > vectoriced versions for beeing printed in mags or adds or
> > apache-T-shirts
> > > ;-) and version I can't think of ATM!
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Chris
> > >
> > > > From: Jose Alberto Fernandez [mailto:j_a_fernandez@yahoo.com]
> > > > > From: Christoph Wilhelms [mailto:Christoph.Wilhelms@impress.com]
> > > > >
> > > > > Regarding the families of logos:
> > > > > In some cases its easy to find groups, but in some it isn't.
> > > > > I really do not
> > > > > want to decide to group them... For instance there are 2
> > > > > similar logos with
> > > > > gray and red and a big ANT on it (from Rubus). I really like
> > > > > the first one,
> > > > > but dislike the second one. what vote should i give, if they
> > > > > are in the same
> > > > > family! Due to that reason I'd -0.5 the "families-idea"
> > > >
> > > > I do not see the problem you have with the family round of
> > > > votes. What has
> > > > been suggested is to have a first round where we pick a
> > > > family and then a
> > > > second round to pick ONE of the logos from the winning
> > > > family. A family will
> > > > be constitutes only by logos of the same submitter that have SMALL
> > > > variations between them (colors, additional text, etc). There
> > > > are several
> > > > logos that can be easily cathegorized that way.
>
>


Mime
View raw message