From ant-dev-return-13653-apmail-jakarta-ant-dev-archive=jakarta.apache.org@jakarta.apache.org Thu May 10 09:28:29 2001 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-ant-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 52320 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2001 09:28:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ant-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 51727 invoked from network); 10 May 2001 09:27:55 -0000 Message-Id: <3.0.6.32.20010510193140.01e3e500@mail.alphalink.com.au> X-Sender: gdonald@mail.alphalink.com.au X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.6 (32) Date: Thu, 10 May 2001 19:31:40 +1000 To: ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org From: Peter Donald Subject: Re: Ant2 logging In-Reply-To: References: <20010510013234.79676.qmail@web13401.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N At 09:02 10/5/01 +0200, Stefan Bodewig wrote: >Diane Holt wrote: > >> --- Peter Donald wrote: >>> >>> None of the discussion is related to that at all ;] - but >>> presumably what you want will be doable by customizing listeners ;) >> >> If that's the case, then I'm completely lost -- so can you (or >> anyone else) take me back a step and explain what it is that -is- >> being discussed? > >I'll try to - using less words than Pete 8-). > >Peter didn't say this very clearly when he started the thread, but he >keeps on repeating that he's not talking about how the output of Ant >is going to look or how it is produced - this is going to remain the >responsibility of Listeners (in Ant1 we call them BuildListener, Peter >calls them ProjectListener now, they are synonyms in this context). > >The question is, how do messages travel from tasks to the listeners. >In Ant1 they are routed by the Project object which is bad for several >reasons (shouldn't be Project's responsibiluty at all and makes it >hard to modify verbosity at a different level than project wide). > >The discussion is on this question, at least this is what it was >intended to be. > >On the topic of hierarchical logging, I'd use Log4J's document at > to get an idea of >the concept. yes - much clearer - thanks ;) Cheers, Pete *-----------------------------------------------------* | "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind, | | and proving that there is no need to do so - almost | | everyone gets busy on the proof." | | - John Kenneth Galbraith | *-----------------------------------------------------*