From ant-dev-return-13553-apmail-jakarta-ant-dev-archive=jakarta.apache.org@jakarta.apache.org Wed May 09 06:41:57 2001 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-ant-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 30024 invoked by uid 500); 9 May 2001 06:41:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ant-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 29782 invoked from network); 9 May 2001 06:41:54 -0000 Message-Id: <3.0.6.32.20010509164620.00a25100@mail.alphalink.com.au> X-Sender: gdonald@mail.alphalink.com.au X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.6 (32) Date: Wed, 09 May 2001 16:46:20 +1000 To: ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org From: Peter Donald Subject: Re: [Vote] Logging Cc: "ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org" In-Reply-To: References: <3.0.6.32.20010509130657.00afc370@mail.alphalink.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N At 11:13 8/5/01 -0700, Jon Stevens wrote: >on 5/8/01 8:06 PM, "Peter Donald" wrote: > >> Exactly: Answer why we would need it. > >I want Log4J because it supports logging to syslogd. You could add that to >logkit but wouldn't that be a "duplication of code" (your words)? > >:-) Don't need to Logkit already does that and has for a year or more ;) Besides which we won't be directly logging to any of the logkit/log4j (I don't think) - almost everything will go through ProjectListener. Cheers, Pete *-----------------------------------------------------* | "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind, | | and proving that there is no need to do so - almost | | everyone gets busy on the proof." | | - John Kenneth Galbraith | *-----------------------------------------------------*