From ant-dev-return-13479-apmail-jakarta-ant-dev-archive=jakarta.apache.org@jakarta.apache.org Tue May 08 14:05:09 2001 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-ant-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 29553 invoked by uid 500); 8 May 2001 14:04:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ant-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 29492 invoked from network); 8 May 2001 14:04:38 -0000 Message-Id: <3.0.6.32.20010509000856.00a638c0@mail.alphalink.com.au> X-Sender: gdonald@mail.alphalink.com.au X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.6 (32) Date: Wed, 09 May 2001 00:08:56 +1000 To: ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org From: Peter Donald Subject: Vetoed point?? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hi, Just checking if the following point is still vetoed? -------------------------------------------------------------- * It should be possible to modify details of the actual build (e.g. classpath, used compiler) without the need to change the build specification. Do build.compiler and build.sysclasspath cover everything or do we need to add more stuff like this? [will need more discussion because of vote by Conor MacNeill] [REJECTED - veto by Conor MacNeill] -------------------------------------------------------------- Cheers, Pete *-----------------------------------------------------* | "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind, | | and proving that there is no need to do so - almost | | everyone gets busy on the proof." | | - John Kenneth Galbraith | *-----------------------------------------------------*