From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:bodewig@apache.org]
> >>Not entirely, at least for the two interpretations I've given, they
> >>belong to (2) as well. If I define a new task/type, I may need a
> >>custom converter.
> >
> > Possibly but should we allow/encourage that sort of action?
>
> How would I use my new data type if I cannot supply a converter for
> the ${} expansion of it? Yes, I think we should allow that.
What sort of data-types are people likely to use?
I would expect to mostly see specialised filesets etc, in which case
the default ${} would be sufficient.
|