ant-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Rees <d.ree...@usa.net>
Subject Re: [VOTE] the simple stuff
Date Tue, 27 Mar 2001 20:33:24 GMT
On Thu, 22 Mar 2001 20:13:20 +1100, Peter Donald wrote:

>At 10:10  22/3/01 +0100, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>>> Each different concern (ie logging, failonerror, classloader,
>>> documentation) could have a different namespace.
>>
>>One possibility - defined task context as David has suggested are
>>another option.
>
>I think that they are both applicable. ie The task context serves as the
>programatic interface for task writers but the different handlers (along
>with converters) exist in the kernel and as the interface for "kernel
>hackers" ;) 
>

Actually, I like the idea of embedding them in a context. It seems to
keep the XML more consistent in terms of elements tying to things.
Something like:

<Context>
  <Logging level="debug" />
</Context>

seems easier for the user to digest than namespaces.

d

Mime
View raw message