ant-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Houston Chan" <>
Subject Re: Would/Can Property's override be configable insteads of hardcode?
Date Fri, 04 Aug 2000 08:39:05 GMT

thanks :).

sorry to have miss the debate, but do we have any mailing-list archive for
reference ?

I expected "properties" should acts like variables in make or shell script,
only find that it can only carry one value.

Thanks ant,

                    Peter Donald                                                         
                    <donaldp@mad.scie        To:       
          >               cc:                                      
                                             Subject:     Re: Would/Can Property's override
                    08/04/00 12:19 PM        be configable insteads of hardcode?         
                    Please respond to                                                    

At 11:55  4/8/00 +0800, you wrote:
>Would/Can Property's override be configable insteads of hardcode?

debate about this raged on dev list a while back. I think the consensus was
that everything gets moved to interpretation time rather than parse time. I
don't know what the opinion was on overiding properties but I believe
people wanted to overide them.

It should be resolved in next release :P



| "Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want |
| to test a man's character, give him power."          |
|       -Abraham Lincoln                               |

View raw message