From james.davidson@eng.sun.com Fri Apr 21 16:00:24 2000 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact ant-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 2837 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2000 16:00:24 -0000 Received: from mercury.sun.com (192.9.25.1) by locus.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Apr 2000 16:00:24 -0000 Received: from shorter.eng.sun.com ([129.144.174.35]) by mercury.Sun.COM (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA18844; Fri, 21 Apr 2000 09:00:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from eng.sun.com (pra-rem-8.Czech.Sun.COM [129.156.75.109]) by shorter.eng.sun.com (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3/ENSMAIL,v1.7) with ESMTP id JAA06650; Fri, 21 Apr 2000 09:00:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <39007825.A66424B@eng.sun.com> Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2000 08:47:49 -0700 From: James Duncan Davidson X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org CC: mpfoemme@ThoughtWorks.com Subject: Re: SAX 1.0 vs SAX 2.0 References: <852568C8.00126C85.00@d54mta04.raleigh.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > 2) Stay with SAX 1.0 and turn off deprecation warnings on Ant builds. +1 -- Actually, use SAX 1.0 through JAXP. .duncan