+1 on the name change
-1 on introducing beaninfo class. I think the introspection is much simpler
to manage and understand. Of course changing all the build.xml files isn't
fun either :-(
Conor
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dion@multitask.com.au [mailto:dion@multitask.com.au]
> Sent: Thursday, 3 February 2000 12:45
> To: ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Problems with 1.3RC1 and taskdef
>
>
> Alternatively, we could introduce a beaninfo class for the
> various classes?
>
> Any votes on that idea?
> --
> dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
> Work: http://www.multitask.com.au
> Play: http://www.trongus.com
> I've just returned from THE Java Programming Conference,
> http://www.SoftwareSummit.com - be there next year
>
> ----- Forwarded by dIon Gillard/Multitask Consulting/AU on
> 03/02/2000 12:44
> -----
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Submitted by Category . Public
>
> "Conor <ant-dev@jakar
> MacNeill" ta.apache.org>
> <conor@m64.com>
> on 03/02/2000
> at 00:36
>
> (Embedded
> image moved to
> file:
> pic21350.pcx)
>
>
>
> RE: Problems with 1.3RC1 and taskdef
>
>
> Dion,
>
> I didn't the details of your problem but I have run into a problem
> (probably
> the same) with 1.3RC1. The Java task does not work. It appears to be
> because
> the introspector does not find the setClass method in Java.java. I changed
> ProjectHelper to dump the names of all the properties as it loops through
> them and all appear but setClass doesn't appear. I changed the method
> setClassname, changed the <java element to use classname="..." and it
> works.
>
> I'm not sure why this is since it works on 1.1.8 and 1.2.2 (NT). Is it a
> bug
> in JDK1.3RC1? Perhaps a simple name change would be expeditious anyway
>
> Cheers
> Conor
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: dion@multitask.com.au [mailto:dion@multitask.com.au]
> > Sent: Wednesday, 2 February 2000 7:55
> > To: ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org
> > Subject: Problems with 1.3RC1 and taskdef
> >
> >
> > Any comments on my 1.3RC1 problems with taskdef? Is anyone else
> > having them
> > or using taskdef under 1.3?
> >
> > The bug does NOT appear under IBM1.1.8.
> > --
> > dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
> > Work: http://www.multitask.com.au
> > Play: http://www.trongus.com
> > I've just returned from THE Java Programming Conference,
> > http://www.SoftwareSummit.com - be there next year
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Previous Document (Embe (Embe Next Document
>
> dded dded
>
> image image
>
> moved moved
>
> to to
>
> file: file:
>
> pic13 pic29
>
> 337.p 498.p
>
> cx) cx)
>
>
>
> Return to
> View
>
>
> (Embedded image
> moved to
> file:
> pic03809.pcx)
>
>
>
>
>
|