rubys@us.ibm.com writes:
>
>
> Andrew Sudell wrote:
> > I had made a post last week about shell portability, that didn't
> > generate much of a reply. I'm assuming that it is desirable for Ant to
> > build cleanly on as wide a range of systems as possible. I've now seen
> > a second ksh-ism or posix-ism show up.
>
> My assumptions match your assumptions. I introduced these regressions on
> you - sorry about that.
>
No problem. I sort of assumed that someone was working on a system
where the difference didn't show. (There are a lot of them.) It was
odd that no one commented last time, but Ant's been making a lot of
forward progress and it was a minor issue.
Drew
--
Drew Sudell asudell@op.net http://www.op.net/~asudell
|