James M Snell wrote:
> I can take a look at this or.... if you're so inclined... patches are
> welcome :-)
>
I didn't want to assume it was supposed to work the way I initially
tried (note to self: get confident, stupid!) Would a refactor of TargetType
to a JDK1.5 enum be acceptable? I assume that works for 1.4
compatibility through retroweaver, but it might impact extensibility.
As I work my way through my implementation, I'm taking notes for a
larger document. Right now, as it happens, I'm working on Provider, so
I'll work what I end up with (what works here? I favor DocBook, but I
can easily just submit the HTML) and submit that first.
cheers,
AC
> - James
>
> Adam Constabaris wrote:
>
>> [snip]
>> (aside: I would have thought that TargetType.get(entry.getValue()) would
>> work, but I ran into identity vs. equality problems, even when I
>> interned the strings)
>>
|